We help organizations maintain human oversight and control over AI systems through rigorous governance frameworks and evidence-based social-science research. We establish decision-making processes, implement bias detection and fairness assessments, and continuously monitor human-AI interactions to ensure systems serve human values and organizational goals.
Comprehensive Governance Framework
Effective AI governance requires more than policy documents—it demands systematic approaches that integrate human oversight into operational workflows. We design governance frameworks that establish clear decision-making authority, define accountability structures, and create oversight mechanisms that function in real-world environments.
Our approach combines technical implementation with social-science methodologies to ensure AI systems remain transparent, accountable, and aligned with human values. We work with your teams to embed governance principles into daily operations, making ethical considerations part of how work actually gets done.
Social-Science Research & Human-AI Interaction
Understanding how humans and AI systems interact is crucial for effective governance. We conduct evidence-based research on human-AI interaction patterns, examining how users understand, trust, and work alongside AI systems. This research informs our governance frameworks and helps identify potential risks before they become problems.
Our social-science approach focuses on interaction pattern analysis to understand how users engage with AI systems, trust and acceptance studies to measure user confidence and adoption, cognitive load assessment to ensure AI systems support rather than overwhelm human decision-making, and behavioral impact evaluation to understand how AI changes work practices and outcomes.
Bias Detection & Fairness Assessment
Algorithmic bias can undermine the effectiveness and legitimacy of AI systems. We implement comprehensive bias detection mechanisms using validated social-science methodologies, ensuring AI systems treat all users fairly and equitably.
Our bias assessment encompasses statistical fairness analysis across protected groups and demographic categories, impact assessment to understand who benefits and who bears costs from AI decisions, accessibility evaluation to ensure all users can effectively interact with AI systems, and transparency analysis to verify that decision criteria are understandable to affected parties.
Human Oversight Mechanisms
Maintaining human control over AI systems requires systematic oversight mechanisms that function in practice, not just in theory. We design and implement oversight processes that ensure humans remain in control of critical decisions while leveraging AI capabilities effectively.
Our oversight mechanisms include decision gates where human judgment is required before AI actions are executed, escalation procedures for handling edge cases and unexpected situations, review processes for monitoring AI system behavior and performance, and intervention protocols for overriding or correcting AI decisions when necessary.
Evidence-Based Evaluation & Documentation
Regulatory compliance and internal accountability require comprehensive documentation and evidence-based evaluation. We establish audit trails, impact assessments, and evaluation frameworks that satisfy both internal governance requirements and external regulatory scrutiny.
Our evaluation approach includes privacy impact assessments using established frameworks and methodologies, algorithmic auditing to verify system behavior matches intended design, social consequence evaluation to understand broader impacts on communities and stakeholders, and compliance documentation that meets regulatory requirements and industry standards.
Next steps
Want to explore governance patterns that fit your context?